Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers All Cancer Incidence Rate

455.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 455.7 which is in the worst 25% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 395.6 while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 419.0.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 35 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (384.8), Three Rivers has a value of 455.7 which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(384.8)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (455.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (468.7).
Prior Value
(468.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

121.4
Cases per 100,000 females
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 121.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 115.6 while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 128.3.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 35 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (122.1), Three Rivers has a value of 121.4 which is lower and better.
VA Value
(122.1)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (121.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (148.6).
Prior Value
(148.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers Colon Cancer Screening: Sigmoidoscopy or Colonoscopy 50-75

Current Value:
82.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the VA Value (70.1%), Three Rivers has a value of 82.8% which is higher and better.
VA Value
(70.1% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (82.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (67.5%).
Prior Value
(67.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health District: Three Rivers Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

42.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 42.1 which is in the worst 25% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.1 while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.2.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 35 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (30.4), Three Rivers has a value of 42.1 which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(30.4)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (42.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.7).
Prior Value
(40.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

6.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 6.7 which is in the best 50% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8 while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 19 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (6.3), Three Rivers has a value of 6.7 which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (6.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.8).
Prior Value
(5.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health District: Three Rivers Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

68.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 68.6 which is in the worst 25% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.4 while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 59.3.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 35 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (47.7), Three Rivers has a value of 68.6 which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(47.7)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (68.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (68.3).
Prior Value
(68.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

81.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the VA Value (79.5%), Three Rivers has a value of 81.2% which is higher and better.
VA Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (81.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (91.7%).
Prior Value
(91.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Health District: Three Rivers Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Melanoma Incidence Rate

28.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 28.6 which is in the worst 25% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5 while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.6.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 32 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (19.3), Three Rivers has a value of 28.6 which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(19.3)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (28.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.3).
Prior Value
(37.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate

12.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 12.7 which is in the best 50% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5 while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 32 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (15.9), Three Rivers has a value of 12.7 which is lower and better.
VA Value
(15.9)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (12.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.2).
Prior Value
(18.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

16.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 16.3 which is in the worst 25% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.8 while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 29 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (11.3), Three Rivers has a value of 16.3 which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(11.3)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (16.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.1).
Prior Value
(19.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers Pancreatic Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Pancreatic Cancer Incidence Rate

17.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 17.7 which is in the worst 25% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.3 while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.4.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 27 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (12.6), Three Rivers has a value of 17.7 which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(12.6)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (17.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.3).
Prior Value
(6.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers Pap Test in Past 3 Years: 21-65

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Pap Test in Past 3 Years: 21-65

95.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the VA Value (84.3%), Three Rivers has a value of 95.7% which is higher and better.
VA Value
(84.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (95.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.4%).
Prior Value
(90.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health District: Three Rivers Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

109.9
Cases per 100,000 males
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 109.9 which is in the worst 25% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 99.0 while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 109.9.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 35 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (96.4), Three Rivers has a value of 109.9 which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(96.4)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (109.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (87.8).
Prior Value
(87.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults with Diabetes

12.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 12.7% which is in the best 50% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.9%.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 30 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (11.5%), Three Rivers has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Three Rivers has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (12.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults with Influenza Vaccination

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults with Influenza Vaccination

44.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 44.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of health districts. Health districts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 48.5% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 22 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (49.4%), Three Rivers has a value of 44.3% which is lower and worse.
VA Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (44.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (54.6%).
Prior Value
(54.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers Adults with Pneumonia Vaccination

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults with Pneumonia Vaccination

39.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 39.4% which is in the best 50% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 34.5% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 31.3%.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 26 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (34.3%), Three Rivers has a value of 39.4% which is higher and better.
VA Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (39.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.8%).
Prior Value
(36.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

26.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 26.3% which is in the worst 25% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.1% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.7%.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 30 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (19.6%), Three Rivers has a value of 26.3% which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (26.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.2%).
Prior Value
(23.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers Poor Mental Health Days

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Poor Mental Health Days

45.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 45.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.8% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.1%.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 26 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (41.8%), Three Rivers has a value of 45.0% which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(41.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (45.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.2%).
Prior Value
(34.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults Engaging in Physical Activity

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults Engaging in Physical Activity

70.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 70.8% which is in the worst 25% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.9% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.1%.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 28 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (79.1%), Three Rivers has a value of 70.8% which is lower and worse.
VA Value
(79.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the US Value (76.3%), Three Rivers has a value of 70.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (70.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.2%).
Prior Value
(75.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults with Asthma

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults with Asthma

15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 15.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.2%.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 31 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (15.0%), Three Rivers has a value of 15.0%.
VA Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.9%), Three Rivers has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers Adults who are Overweight or Obese

73.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 73.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 72.0% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.4%.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 25 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (68.1%), Three Rivers has a value of 73.7% which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(68.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the US Value (68.3%), Three Rivers has a value of 73.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(68.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (73.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.1%).
Prior Value
(69.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Health District: Three Rivers Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

Current Value:
81.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 81.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of health districts. Health districts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.6% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.8%.
VA Health Districts
The distribution is based on data from 32 Virginia health districts.
Compared to the VA Value (85.0%), Three Rivers has a value of 81.6% which is lower and worse.
VA Value
(85.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Virginia State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.6%), Three Rivers has a value of 81.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (81.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.3%).
Prior Value
(85.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Three Rivers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.