Search for Indicators

Priority Area: Obesity

Turn Colorblind Mode On See the Legend

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Caroline

Current Value:

County: Caroline

31.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Caroline has a value of 31.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Caroline has a value of 31.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Caroline (31.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.0%).
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Over time, the Caroline value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Fredericksburg City

Current Value:

County: Fredericksburg City

22.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Fredericksburg City has a value of 22.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fredericksburg City has a value of 22.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Fredericksburg City (22.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.6%).
Prior Value
(22.6%)
Over time, the Fredericksburg City value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: King George

Current Value:

County: King George

27.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, King George has a value of 27.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, King George has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, King George (27.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.7%).
Prior Value
(31.7%)
Over time, the King George value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Orange

Current Value:

County: Orange

27.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Orange has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Orange has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Orange (27.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Over time, the Orange value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Prince William

Current Value:

County: Prince William

34.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Prince William has a value of 34.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Prince William has a value of 34.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Prince William (34.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.4%).
Prior Value
(32.4%)
Over time, the Prince William value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Spotsylvania

Current Value:

County: Spotsylvania

32.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Spotsylvania has a value of 32.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Spotsylvania has a value of 32.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Spotsylvania (32.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.2%).
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Over time, the Spotsylvania value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Stafford

Current Value:

County: Stafford

35.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Stafford has a value of 35.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stafford has a value of 35.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Stafford (35.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.1%).
Prior Value
(34.1%)
Over time, the Stafford value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Westmoreland

Current Value:

County: Westmoreland

29.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Westmoreland has a value of 29.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Westmoreland has a value of 29.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the prior value, Westmoreland (29.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.8%).
Prior Value
(27.8%)
Over time, the Westmoreland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults who are Overweight or Obese Health District: Prince William

Current Value:

Health District: Prince William

72.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Prince William has a value of 72.0% which is in the best 50% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 72.0% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.4%.
VA Health Districts
Compared to the VA Value (68.1%), Prince William has a value of 72.0% which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(68.1%)
Compared to the US Value (68.3%), Prince William has a value of 72.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(68.3%)
Compared to the prior value, Prince William (72.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (63.5%).
Prior Value
(63.5%)
Over time, the Prince William value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who are Overweight or Obese Health District: Rappahannock

Current Value:

Health District: Rappahannock

78.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Rappahannock has a value of 78.6% which is in the worst 25% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 72.0% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.4%.
VA Health Districts
Compared to the VA Value (68.1%), Rappahannock has a value of 78.6% which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(68.1%)
Compared to the US Value (68.3%), Rappahannock has a value of 78.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(68.3%)
Compared to the prior value, Rappahannock (78.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.3%).
Prior Value
(70.3%)
Over time, the Rappahannock value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who are Overweight or Obese Health District: Rappahannock-Rapidan

Current Value:

Health District: Rappahannock-Rapidan

62.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Rappahannock-Rapidan has a value of 62.3% which is in the best 50% of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 71.9% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.3%.
VA Health Districts
Compared to the VA Value (67.3%), Rappahannock-Rapidan has a value of 62.3% which is lower and better.
VA Value
(67.3%)
Compared to the US Value (67.1%), Rappahannock-Rapidan has a value of 62.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(67.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Rappahannock-Rapidan (62.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.5%).
Prior Value
(74.5%)
Over time, the Rappahannock-Rapidan value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who are Overweight or Obese Health District: Three Rivers

Current Value:

Health District: Three Rivers

73.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Health Districts, Three Rivers has a value of 73.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of health districts. Health districts in the best 50% have a value lower than 72.0% while health districts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.4%.
VA Health Districts
Compared to the VA Value (68.1%), Three Rivers has a value of 73.7% which is higher and worse.
VA Value
(68.1%)
Compared to the US Value (68.3%), Three Rivers has a value of 73.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(68.3%)
Compared to the prior value, Three Rivers (73.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.1%).
Prior Value
(69.1%)
Over time, the Three Rivers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Caroline

Current Value:

County: Caroline

58.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Caroline has a value of 58.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 71.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.4%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Caroline has a value of 58.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the VA Value (83.6%), Caroline has a value of 58.7% which is lower and worse.
VA Value
(83.6%)
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Caroline has a value of 58.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Caroline (58.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (51.1%).
Prior Value
(51.1%)
Learn More
Save Card

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Fredericksburg City

Current Value:

County: Fredericksburg City

100.0%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Fredericksburg City has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 71.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.4%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fredericksburg City has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the VA Value (83.6%), Fredericksburg City has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
VA Value
(83.6%)
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Fredericksburg City has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Fredericksburg City (100.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (100.0%).
Prior Value
(100.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: King George

Current Value:

County: King George

69.3%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, King George has a value of 69.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 71.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.4%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, King George has a value of 69.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the VA Value (83.6%), King George has a value of 69.3% which is lower and worse.
VA Value
(83.6%)
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), King George has a value of 69.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
Compared to the prior value, King George (69.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (78.6%).
Prior Value
(78.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Orange

Current Value:

County: Orange

57.9%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Orange has a value of 57.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 71.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.4%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Orange has a value of 57.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the VA Value (83.6%), Orange has a value of 57.9% which is lower and worse.
VA Value
(83.6%)
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Orange has a value of 57.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Orange (57.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (64.4%).
Prior Value
(64.4%)
Learn More
Save Card

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Prince William

Current Value:

County: Prince William

96.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Prince William has a value of 96.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 71.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.4%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Prince William has a value of 96.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the VA Value (83.6%), Prince William has a value of 96.7% which is higher and better.
VA Value
(83.6%)
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Prince William has a value of 96.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Prince William (96.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (96.3%).
Prior Value
(96.3%)
Learn More
Save Card

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Spotsylvania

Current Value:

County: Spotsylvania

84.4%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Spotsylvania has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 71.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.4%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Spotsylvania has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the VA Value (83.6%), Spotsylvania has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
VA Value
(83.6%)
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Spotsylvania has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Spotsylvania (84.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (83.8%).
Prior Value
(83.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Stafford

Current Value:

County: Stafford

83.1%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Stafford has a value of 83.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 71.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.4%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Stafford has a value of 83.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the VA Value (83.6%), Stafford has a value of 83.1% which is lower and worse.
VA Value
(83.6%)
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Stafford has a value of 83.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Stafford (83.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (86.7%).
Prior Value
(86.7%)
Learn More
Save Card

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Westmoreland

Current Value:

County: Westmoreland

22.0%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to VA Counties, Westmoreland has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 71.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.4%.
VA Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Westmoreland has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the VA Value (83.6%), Westmoreland has a value of 22.0% which is lower and worse.
VA Value
(83.6%)
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Westmoreland has a value of 22.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Westmoreland (22.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (34.7%).
Prior Value
(34.7%)
Learn More
Save Card